I have cataloged this problem many times in many sports across the world. It seems that perhaps the focus and glare is greatest here with North American sports (mainly football and hockey), but this problem extends further. This issue perhaps came to a head in the UK over the past week with this article by Tom English;
Barry O’Driscoll played rugby for Ireland in the Five Nations championship of 1971.
As a respected doctor (whose son was team doctor for Ireland and the Lions in the recent past) with a background as an international full-back he became an important figure on the International Rugby Board where for 15 years he held positions on the medical, anti-doping and disciplinary committees. Until late last summer, when he resigned.
Dr. O’Driscoll left his post because of the way the International Rugby Board (IRB) was/is handling concussions on the field and in general. As an aside, the IRB is a founding partner of the Zurich statement as well.
What would make a highly trained and well-respected doc – with rugby in the blood – step away? Take a look, specifically at what happened to his nephew;
After one collision too many that day Brian O’Driscoll lost his bearings, was clearly unsteady on his feet and had to be helped from the field, like a boxer assisted from the ring. You did not need experience in pathology to know that the great man was out of it for a moment in time. Yet a few minutes later he was back on the pitch, supposedly as bright as a button and fully recovered.
He was back on the field because ?????;
There is an accompanying rule now – still on trial – and it states that if a player with suspected concussion can pass a series of tests lasting five minutes then he can be allowed back into the fray: the Pitch Side Concussion Assessment (PSCA) – or the five-minute rule.
Even worse the “new” rule was not even in place when his nephew sustained his concussion, leading the good doc to question what the sanctioning body and the medical board was doing;
“Rugby is trivialising concussion,” he says. “They are sending these guys back on to the field and into the most brutal arena. It’s ferocious out there. The same player who 18 months ago was given a minimum of seven days recovery time is now given five minutes. There is no test that you can do in five minutes that will show that a player is not concussed. It is accepted the world over. We have all seen players who have appeared fine five minutes after a concussive injury then vomiting later in the night. To have this as acceptable in rugby, what kind of message are we sending out?
“If a boxer cannot defend himself after ten seconds he has to have a brain scan before he comes back. And we’re not talking ten seconds for a rugby player, we’re talking maybe a minute that these guys are not sure what’s going on. They don’t have to have a brain scan, they have to have five minutes where they have to stand up straight without falling over four times, they have a basic memory test – ‘What’s the score? Who are you playing against? Which half did it happen in? And do you have any symptoms?’
“These questions should serve as a landmark for when you examine them six hours later to see if they’re getting worse or if they’re bleeding into their brain. That’s why you ask them, not to see if they can go back on. They are already concussed at that point. You don’t need to ask questions to find that out. If six hours later their responses are worse than they were earlier you say ‘Wait a minute, this shouldn’t be the case, is this guy going to bleed?’ That’s why you ask the questions and so it has always been. But we’re going in the other direction now. We’re going from being stood down for three weeks to one week to five minutes with players who are showing exactly the same symptoms. The five-minute rule came out of the blue. I couldn’t be a part of it so I resigned from the IRB. It saddened me, but I couldn’t have my name attached to that decision.”
As you can clearly see some places are not quite ready to accept the real issue of concussions – not the actual injury – the mismanagement of the injury once it occurs. If the IRB places the new “five-minute pitch side rule” into place they are going in the absolute wrong direction.
If any player in any sport shows clear signs of concussion they should be removed and not allowed back in, period. Even Zurich, which the IRB is part of states this. Dr. O’Driscoll is merely saving his reputation by stepping aside, and in my opinion it is the exact correct move.
HockeyNow question and answer with Charles Tator
Scottish rugby has become somewhat of a surrogate for the problems in rugby when dealing with the current concussion issue. Scotland certainly is not the only place this has become and issue (even though the IRB would like to tell you so); and this issue of concussions and sport seem similar in nature to what we have seen here in the States with American Football.
From Sunday Night down in Australia a story of how 
Yesterday I helped launch the #C4CT cause via the blog and twitter and it was nice to see the interest really begin to peak (thanks 
The 
The Concussion Blog 